As participants in the financial services industry, we should be interested in what the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFBP) is working on. To better understand this regulator, StratAgree has begun to review their monthly reports of consumer complaints. The most recent report was released in late December. In it, the CFPB lays out complaints by product/service, by state/district and by company.
Please note that other organizations and individuals have already criticized the CFPB data and analyses as flawed, inaccurate and downright wrong. Our purpose is not to criticize as we believe that over time the data will become more valuable. As a relatively new resource, we believe it will improve. But, because of the report’s current shortcomings, we will attempt to make reasonable corrections as practical.
The monthly report is comprised of three main sections:
Section 1 – Complaint Volume (by product, state, and company)
Section 2 – Product Spotlight (a different product profiled each month)
Section 3 – Geographic Spotlight (a different state profiled each month)
This month’s review will focus on the first section of the November 2015 report. Note that the CFPB uses different time periods for different metrics. To avoid confusion, we’ll point out the month(s) being reported in chart titles and captions. Also, when practical we will provide a comparison to the June 2015 report (the first report in the series).
Section 1 – Complaint Volume
Complaints by Product/Service
The top three products/services complained about in November 2015 were Student Loans, Debt Collection and Mortgages comprising 31%, 19% and 19% of total complaints, respectively. These top three products/services are the same as in the June 2015 report where Student Loans, Debt Collection and Mortgages comprised 32%, 20% and 19% of total complaints, respectively.
The bottom three products/services complained about in November 2015 were Bank Account or Services, Money Transfer and Other Financial Services comprising 1% of total complaints, each.
These bottom three products/services are the same as in the June 2015 report where Bank Account or Services, Money Transfer and Other Financial Services each comprised 1% of total complaints.
Complaints by State/District
Because populations vary widely from state to state, total complaints per state is misleading. We’ll therefore use the normalized data (complaints per 100,000 population).
The top three states/districts for complaints in November 2015 were Washington DC, Delaware and Maryland with 674, 433 and 390 complaints per 100,000 population, respectively.
These top three states/districts are the same as in the June 2015 report (the first CFPB report) where Washington DC, Delaware and Maryland had 577, 371 and 333 complaints per 100,000 population, respectively.
The bottom three states/districts for complaints in November 2015 were North Dakota, Iowa and West Virginia with 99, 113 and 117 complaints per 100,000 population, respectively. These bottom three states/districts are the same as in the June 2015 report (the first CFPB report) where North Dakota, Iowa and West Virginia had 81, 96 and 97 complaints per 100,000 population, respectively.
The regions with the highest per-capita complaints are the District of Columbia and two of its neighboring states–Delaware and Maryland. This would suggest that awareness of the CFPB is highest in the regions with the highest concentration of federal government and CFPB employees as well as their friends and families. We’ll watch to see if this disturbing anomaly subsides over time.
Monthly Complaints for Top Ten Most Complained About Companies
The data for complaints by company is provided as a rolling average of 3 months’ complaints. The most current data is from the period July – September, 2015. Apart from the age of the data, there are two big problems with the complaints by company data. First, it does not factor in the size of the company. And second, it does not take into account differences in industry (credit reporting vs. consumer banking vs. credit card companies, etc.). With these flaws, larger companies will obviously have more complaints than smaller companies. Here are the numbers in graphical form.
Let’s look more closely at the four banks listed in the “Top Ten Most Complained About…” list. They just happen to be the largest four banks in the country. For context, here is a pie chart showing the 2015 market shares of Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, Citibank and all others:
Considering their large size, we can expect the number of complaints about these banks to be large as well. In fact, we could assume that complaints about each of these banks should roughly equal their market share. But, before we can make that comparison, we need to strip out non-bank product complaints from the CFPB data so we can compare apples-to-apples. Here’s a chart showing the breakout of complaints about the largest banks as a percent of total bank product complaints (credit reporting and alternative financial services complaints have been removed):
Breaking the data this way, we see that the four banks that have 54% of the consumer banking market are the target of 60% of consumer bank product complaints. More interesting is the fact that Bank of America and Wells Fargo appear to have more complaints than their market share would indicate while Chase and Citibank appear to have fewer complaints than we would expect. That observation makes it just wrong for the CFPB to label them as part of the “Ten Most Complained About Companies”
Only time will tell if the CFPB data quality will improve, but for now we can’t determine with certainty whether the biggest banks are better or worse than other banks.
The vast number of consumer complaints to the CFPB relate to credit issues–76% of complaints appear to be about credit products and credit reporting and 19% are regarding debt collection. Other financial services (money transfer, etc.) account for 2% of total complaints while complaints about checking and savings accounts were just 1% of the total.
Complaints about checking and savings accounts were just 1% of the CFPB total.
Geographically, the highest complaining regions were Washington DC, Delaware and Maryland with complaints per 100,000 population of 674, 433 and 390, respectively. Complaints for the rest of the country averaged 197 per 100,000 population. It would appear that CFPB employees, their families and friends are driving artificially high complaint volume in those regions.
Lastly, the CFPB’s Top Ten Most Complained About Companies data doesn’t tell us much because it doesn’t consider company size or other differences (banks are lumped in with credit reporting agencies, monoline credit card companies, mortgage servicers and alternative financial services providers like payday lenders and money transfer businesses).
Even with the flaws, it is helpful to see which products are being complained about and which regions generate the most complaints. StratAgree will continue to monitor future CFPB monthly complaint reports and strive to draw meaningful conclusions from them.